New Zealand is
generally well regarded in the international community. That is probably one of
the biggest things going for former Prime Minister Helen Clark (aside for the
moment from her considerable and formidable personal skills and talents) in her
bid to become the next United Nations’ Secretary-General. She comes from a
country which is one of the oldest continuous Parliament democracies in the
world, with a commitment to international co-operation (the role wartime Prime
Minister Peter Fraser played in the formation of the United Nations is still
widely recognised) and a reputation for speaking out (the Kirk Government’s
stand against French nuclear testing in the Pacific and David Lange’s
anti-nuclearism are legend). Even today, Prime Minister John Key is developing
a reputation as a leader who speaks up in international meetings for the
interests of small nations and the protection of human rights generally. If
Helen Clark’s bid is successful, as all New Zealanders hope, our country will
be justifiably proud to see our national values recognised on the world stage.
All of which
makes the one great blind spot in our foreign policy that much harder to
tolerate and understand. New Zealand’s 1972 decision to recognise the People’s
Republic of China was hailed at the time as in the vein of the independence our
foreign policy has become noted for. We were again forging a new path others
may wish to have followed, but sadly, as the years have gone by, that
independent streak has first weakened, then frayed, and now virtually
disappeared altogether. As we have become closer to China economically and
politically, our policy approach has simply become more timid and craven. When
the Lange Government’s anti-nuclear policy was at its peak, international
commentators used to describe New Zealand as the mouse that roared. Now, they
could just as accurately describe us as the mouse that scuttled for cover.
Our foreign
policy now has a desperate air to it. It is no longer about trying to secure
our trading future, or playing our part in the Commonwealth and wider
international community. No, New Zealand’s foreign policy today is all about
not upsetting China. Even though we have a free trade agreement with China, and
generally good political relations, we dare not use those links to speak out
about issues of concern. Despite our laudable opposition to the use of the
death penalty worldwide, we suddenly become mute when it comes to China, one of
the most judicially murderous nations on earth. We pointedly state no view on
China’s increasing incursions into the Pacific and its building of artificial
islands in the South China Sea to extend its national frontiers. Only once
international adjudication has ruled against China do we meekly state that
maybe China should respect international law. Even this week, there have been
reports that we are unwilling to do too much about reportedly inferior Chinese
steel fabrications being used in local projects because China has apparently
threatened retaliation against Fonterra and other exporters if we complain.
Now, of course
China is a much bigger and more powerful nation than New Zealand, and of
course, the relationship with China is far more important to New Zealand, than
the other way around. As a consequence, there are those who argue it is a case
of “beggars cannot be choosers” and we cannot expect China to play the game any
other way. They were the same voices who said we could not take France to the
World Court and expect to win as we did in the 1970s; or that we could not challenge
United States’ nuclear defence policy and expect no retaliations, when we did
so in the 1980s with little impact on trade and a temporary political
frostiness which began to thaw from the time of Prime Minister Bolger in the
early 1990s.
The sad thing is that
these voices of timidity represent the policy of the Ministry of Foreign
Affairs. Their cringing pathological fear of doing anything to upset China is not
only weak and cowardly – it is downright humiliating and utterly embarrassing.
It is time for New Zealand to grow some backbone when it comes to its
relationship with the still dictatorial, authoritarian China.
I think that your piece is timely. It's a reminder that our well-respected independent voice is indeed being drowned in the stuffy air of fluff.
ReplyDeleteIt would be interesting if we decided to seek a trade agreement with Russia - even though there are huge implications related to pessimisms. We did it with China.
Like you, I am concerned we are not actively involved in the South China Sea dispute. If we are friends, then why are we not making more and certainly loud noises about this to the hierarchy in China? You are right, its embarrassing!
Hello Everybody,
ReplyDeleteMy name is Mrs Sharon Sim. I live in Singapore and i am a happy woman today? and i told my self that any lender that rescue my family from our poor situation, i will refer any person that is looking for loan to him, he gave me happiness to me and my family, i was in need of a loan of S$250,000.00 to start my life all over as i am a single mother with 3 kids I met this honest and GOD fearing man loan lender that help me with a loan of S$250,000.00 SG. Dollar, he is a GOD fearing man, if you are in need of loan and you will pay back the loan please contact him tell him that is Mrs Sharon, that refer you to him. contact Dr Purva Pius,via email:(urgentloan22@gmail.com) Thank you.
BORROWERS APPLICATION DETAILS
1. Name Of Applicant in Full:……..
2. Telephone Numbers:……….
3. Address and Location:…….
4. Amount in request………..
5. Repayment Period:………..
6. Purpose Of Loan………….
7. country…………………
8. phone…………………..
9. occupation………………
10.age/sex…………………
11.Monthly Income…………..
12.Email……………..
Regards.
Managements
Email Kindly Contact: urgentloan22@gmail.com