The 6th
anniversary this week of Christchurch’s devastating earthquake, and the
horrific fires that have been fringing the city in recent days are timely
reminders of the vulnerability we have to natural disasters.
One extraordinary
constant at times like this is the dedication and commitment of all our
emergency services personnel – our firefighters, ambulance officers, civil
defence, Police and all those who pitch in to help. They are overwhelmingly
volunteers, giving of their time and expertise to help others in a serious
situation. They deserve our eternal thanks and gratitude for what they do.
But thanks and
gratitude alone are not enough, and no basis on which to build viable emergency
services for the future. We need to ensure that our volunteers and career
emergency staff are equally well trained and resourced to meet the challenges
varying natural disasters are likely to throw upon us in the years to come.
Inevitably, there
will be some form of overall inquiry into the Christchurch fire. After the
earthquakes, a special Royal Commission was established to review all aspects
of the earthquake, including response and recovery performances, and to make
recommendations for future improvements. The Fire Service has already advised
it will be carrying out its own operational review of its performance in the
fires, and there have been many calls for an independent investigation of the
overall civil defence response. Such inquiries need to be seen as steps towards
learning lessons and improving performance, rather than blame-chasing
witch-hunts.
Civil Defence has
been the poor relation for too long. Even though there has been a national
Ministry of Emergency Management, it has been pitched uncomfortably for too
long between central and local government, with no-one too sure where
responsibility really lies, as a consequence. There are some notable exceptions
– Wellington’s Emergency Management Office, which does a fantastic job
promoting community resilience and safety, comes to mind – but for too many,
the image of men with clip boards is still too prevalent.
My own experience
as Minister of Internal Affairs bringing together our new national Fire and
Emergency New Zealand from 1 July this year has been instructive. My personal
view, not necessarily that of the Government at this stage, is that the move to
Fire and Emergency New Zealand presages a model that will become the overall
response to civil defence in the future. Over time – years rather than months –
I see Fire and Emergency New Zealand being expanded to include civil defence,
and in a little longer time frame, potentially ambulance services as well.
Already, as the Christchurch fires, and before them the Christchurch and
Kaikoura earthquakes have shown, the current Fire Service is being looked towards
to provide the response leadership in such cases, so it seems to be only
logical in time that the new national Fire and Emergency New Zealand, once
properly established, will be expanded to also include wider aspects of civil
defence and emergency response.
One of the great
strengths of our society is that in times of travail we all pitch in to help,
often with secondary regard to our own circumstances. That is the spirit we
need to capture when it comes to the future of civil defence and emergency
management. This is not about developing the large “standing army” some are
fearful and so scornful of, nor is it about building empires. Much more
pragmatically, it is much more about ensuring that our communities are at all
times best placed to protect themselves.
With the reduction of urban fires, the Fire Service looks to be wanting to take over other professional services rather than trim their cloth to suit. Communities are well served by ambulance and other medical services ... leave them alone!
ReplyDelete