For
each of us, there
is a golden time in our lives, a period we look back on, where everything
seemed rosy, where setbacks were few, and which we wish we could recreate
tomorrow. It is but a pleasant memory, which rarely can be rekindled, as time
and circumstances move inevitably on. Such nostalgia is not a problem. Indeed,
it can be quite a positive experience. The only difficulty emerges when we try
to recreate it, and fail to appreciate it was a snapshot in time that has gone
forever.
For
the current Labour-led Government, the golden time appears to be the era of the
third Labour Government between 1972 and 1975. This was the era where bold
decisions were made that stood out in stark relief to the years of conformity
and complacency during the 1950s and 1960s.
China
was recognised; the troops were brought home from Vietnam; the Springbok Tour
was stopped; the French were taken to the World Court over nuclear testing in
the Pacific and nuclear ship visits to New Zealand were suspended. Colour
television and the second state-run channel were introduced; beneficiaries
received a Christmas bonus; and the Queen Elizabeth Arts Council and the
Waitangi Tribunal were established. A bold superannuation scheme we still
hanker after was briefly put in place. There was talk of a new city being built at Rolleston near
Christchurch and a national Ohu scheme, based on Israel's kibbutz system, was
mooted for young people interested in communal living.
Heady
days indeed. but it all came crashing down after the impact of the 1973 Oil
Shock. Unemployment (which at one stage
had been literally one person) and shortages of materials began to soar,
delaying housing and commercial and industrial development; the Government was
forced to borrow massively overseas to meet the soaring oil bill; inflation,
which Labour had promised to "knock for six" exploded threefold; and,
the Labour Government was swept ignominiously from office after just three
years.
Yet,
today, nearly 50 years later, it is the idealism, not the failure, that is
remembered so wistfully. Ministers in the present Government, many of whom who
were some years away from being born then, seem to yearn for a return to those
apparently idyllic and simpler times.
There
are a couple of lessons from the fate of the third Labour Government that the
present administration seems unwilling to confront. The first is that the
politics of the grand gesture - in this case, the establishment of the billion
dollar Provincial Growth Fund, or the Kiwibuild promise of 100,000 new affordable
homes, or the decision to stop oil and gas exploration, come to mind - have to
be followed by actions of substance. Otherwise, the bold gesture begins to look
like a hollow lie.
The
second lesson to learn is the constraint of moving at a pace and direction the
public feels comfortable with, and avoiding getting too far ahead of public
opinion. One of the reasons why the 1984-1990 Labour Government was able to
make its radical changes was because the public generally believed change was
overdue. Moreover, the Government was constantly explaining its actions and
decisions, giving the dual sense of both assurance that it knew what it was
doing, and that the public was being taken into its confidence. Once the public
came to doubt both these things after 1987, that Government's demise was as
swift and even more dramatic than in 1975.
It
was the Spanish philosopher George Santayana who observed that those who cannot
remember the past are condemned to repeat it. An ironic warning really, given
that Santayana's work enjoyed a brief renaissance in the 1970s, with posters of
his writings adorning the walls of many student flats, some 20 years after his
death. In its nostalgia to recreate the spirit (or what the bumbling lawyer
Denis Denuto better described as "the vibe" in the great Australian
film, "The Castle") Labour could do well to remember the gentle words
of Santayana.
No comments:
Post a Comment