9 April 2015
A quiet
revolution is underway in the provision of public services. Under the guise of
its “Better Public Services” programme the Government is stealthily but
deliberately changing the way in which public services are delivered, and also,
and perhaps more importantly, the way the public service identifies and designs
the services it provides.
The more public
area of this process is the 10 Key Result Areas, which for the first time sets
specific targets and performance goals for public sector agencies. Specific
policy outcomes are being linked to services provided. By focusing, for example,
on reducing the numbers of vulnerable children, or reducing the level of petty
crime, the Government is really making clear the link between its policy
objectives and its specific activities.
The implications
of all this are as clear as they are dramatic. No longer will what is
essentially displacement activity be tolerated. There has to be a clear purpose
for the provision of public services, and a definable outcome. Just doing
things the same because this is the way they have always been done is no longer
an option. Of course, fiscal considerations are a driver, but they are by no
means the only one. Government agencies are being more thoroughly challenged to
think about the Government’s policy objectives and the best way to achieve
these. What that has done has been to start to unleash a new responsiveness within
the public sector, which has seen many more innovative solutions being
proposed, and a more equal dialogue between Ministers and public servants on
what can be achieved than has been the case in recent experience.
As Minister of
internal Affairs I am responsible for Result Area 10, which relates to the
provision of on-line government services. Our objective is to have 70% of transactions
in ten major area of public interaction performed
on-line by 2017. Presently, the figure sits at just over 46%, leaving us well
on target to achieve the 2017 goal. Passport renewal is the shining example,
with over 40% of renewals already carried out on-line, within a couple of days.
Now, of course
there are dinosaurs who either resist, ignore, or remain suspicious of what all
this means. Some, but by no means all, of the state unions remain in that camp,
but that is no real surprise as some are still fighting the passage of the
State Sector Act 27 years ago!
The worst and
most arrogant dinosaurs are those quasi-government bodies who somehow think the
Government’s policies do not apply to them, and that they can just carry on
doing what they have always done. The worst, by a country mile and then some,
is the New Zealand Transport Agency which, leaving aside its precious and
downright silly pronouncements on road safety, regards itself as a complete law
unto itself when building new state highways is concerned, as my constituents
in Tawa and Takapu are presently finding out.
NZTA’s sublime
arrogance in proceeding with a link road proposal the neither local people, nor
local authorities want or think is even necessary is breathtaking in the
extreme. But what is more repugnant is NZTA’s clumsy attempts at blackmail –
threatening to withdraw funding from the widely supported Petone to Grenada
road unless it gets its own way on the llnk road.
If NZTA cannot
understand and respond to the depth of local feeling on this issue, then maybe
it is time to unceremoniously dump its current entire board and senior
management and replace them who fully understand – and support – the concept of
Better Public Services.
No comments:
Post a Comment