12 November 2015
Somewhere along
the way this week the plot got well and truly lost. Uproar in Parliament,
walk-outs, protests and people shouting at and over each other may be all good
theatre, a modern form of gladiators in the arena if you like, but after it is
over, the fact remains, nothing has changed as a result.
Moreover, the
issue itself seems to have become secondary to the noise it has generated. And
the issue here is simple: Australia is treating people in its detention camps –
in the main New Zealanders awaiting deportation – in a way that is appalling,
no matter which way you look at it. Yes, there are definitely very evil people
amongst them who have committed unspeakable crimes, with whom we would not
usually wish to associate, but they still have the same basic human rights as
the rest of us. The argument should be focussing on how these rights are being
upheld in the detention camps. On the strong face of it, the detainees are now
worse off than when they were in prison, even though they have presumably paid
for their crimes in Australia. This cannot be just.
And that is the
real issue here. Are these detainees being justly treated, and if not, what can
we in New Zealand reasonably do about it? There has always been a more frontier
approach to justice in Australia, as the treatment of their indigenous people
has shown, and the current treatment of boat refugees continues to show. I suspect
most New Zealanders are far from comfortable with the notion of holding such
people captive on offshore islands, and would not let a New Zealand government
even consider doing so.
That different
approach is where our focus needs to be. The modern concentration camp approach
Australia has taken is simply wrong. It was wrong when the British tried it in
Northern Ireland in the 1970s; it is wrong in Guantanomo Bay, or in Israel
today. Australia is no different. The right to due process and fair and open trials
is inalienable. So New Zealand needs to be asserting basic human rights and
freedoms, not stooping to the name-calling and abuse that has passed for debate
over the last week.
Australia is a
sovereign state. We cannot automatically require it to change its laws, just
because they affront us. The Prime Minister is right on that score. But we can,
and should, be speaking out as loudly and frequently as we can against
abhorrent practices, especially given the mantle of family the Australians like
to drape upon us. After all, most families are blunt with each other and speak
out about what they do not like. We should be as well.
The political
civil war of the last week has done nothing at all for any of the detainees on
Christmas Island. Rather than turning their guns on each other to pointless
effect, the Government and the Opposition need to be turning on the real
villains of the piece – Ministers like Peter Dutton and others in the
Australian Government who continue to promote and support such savage and inhumane
policies.
Finally, a politician prepared to speak up for human rights for all.Congratulations.
ReplyDeleteWe have so lost our way as a country that our forebears who were instrumental in setting up the UN and respect for human rights would have been appalled .
Our Prime Minister is cowardly and out of control . His government's arrogance seems to know no bounds. His comments in Parliament were just party politics and an attempt at diversion from his supine response to Australia.
I am so deeply ashamed that our country has made no comment on Australia's human rights record at the UN. But I guess I am naive to expect statesmanship from a PM whose only credo appears to be "lets make a deal"
Well done again
Finally, a politician prepared to speak up for human rights for all.Congratulations.
ReplyDeleteWe have so lost our way as a country that our forebears who were instrumental in setting up the UN and respect for human rights would have been appalled .
Our Prime Minister is cowardly and out of control . His government's arrogance seems to know no bounds. His comments in Parliament were just party politics and an attempt at diversion from his supine response to Australia.
I am so deeply ashamed that our country has made no comment on Australia's human rights record at the UN. But I guess I am naive to expect statesmanship from a PM whose only credo appears to be "lets make a deal"
Well done again
This comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDeleteThis comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDeleteAre you from Australia or New Zealand..?
DeleteThis comment has been removed by the author.
DeletePerhaps if you read up on the issue and actually acquainted yourself with the facts or even just some of the facts then perhaps you might be worth a reply
DeleteThis comment has been removed by the author.
DeleteI'm sure Mr Dunne has visited the centre and seen for himself, and not taken the word of a group of violent hardened criminals that have been convicted of serious crime. These men, who have set fire to the centre and caused extensive damage (worthy people one and all) have also reportedly bashed and intimidated other detainees.
ReplyDeleteBut they are somehow victims of perfidious Australia, rather than opportunist hardened criminals who will say and do whatever it takes to thwart Australia's right to deport people who fail a character test because of criminality.
Place the shoe on the other foot Mr Dunne. Would you like these men in New Zealand if they were Australian?
I hope Mr Dunne speaks to some of the people at Christmas Island, rather than the bros who are causing the damage.
Amazing how you can get the facts so wrong but that happens when you view everything through a lens of prejudice. The people rioting aren't the kiwis but the incarcerated from the boats.
DeleteDoesn't it worry you at all that people are forced from their homes of long standing by retrospective legislation accumulating minor offences and then placed in detention with no rights?
If Australia had said well from now on these are the rules fair enough but this kind of legislation that recriminalizes someone after they have served their time is state tyranny that would not be out of place in soviet Russia or Nazi Germany. And remember it's all very well to be complacent when it is happening to someone else but what protection will you have when they come for you some time in the future about something else because state tyranny knows no boundaries and respects no-one.
This comment has been removed by the author.
DeleteThis comment has been removed by the author.
DeleteThis comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDelete